

Updated: May 3, 2026 / 6 min read
Contents
Rate this article
Before talking tools — a bit of context. According to the NRI 2024 Digital Readiness Index, Uzbekistan sits below 45 out of 100 (ADB, 2025). That's not a criticism — it's an opportunity. The automation market here is not yet saturated. Those who implement proper processes now will gain a head start over competitors still stuck in spreadsheets.
Meanwhile, business in the country is growing fast: retail turnover in 2024 grew by 9.9% in comparable prices (INFOLine, 2024) — higher than Kazakhstan, Russia, and Belarus. Sales growth is good news. But with growth, Excel breaks faster.
One more factor: the government is actively stimulating SMB digitalization under the "Digital Uzbekistan-2030" strategy — subsidized loans for software purchases, grants, regional support centers. The barrier to entry is lower now than it's ever been.
Bottom line: If your competitors are still in Excel — you have a window. It won't stay open forever.
Let's be honest — Excel isn't bad. It's convenient, familiar, and free. When our team worked on small projects, we also managed clients in spreadsheets — and it worked.
It worked when there were two of us.
According to HubSpot (2024), 40% of salespeople still store customer data in spreadsheets. I believe it — because I see it every week in client meetings.
Excel works if you:
But it has a ceiling. And it arrives faster than you think.
Here are three situations I've seen personally — at client companies and inside our own team at different growth stages.
Situation one. Two managers opened a shared file at the same time. One saved their version. The other's data — gone. An hour of work, three clients without status. That's not an Excel bug — that's its architecture.
Situation two. The lead manager goes on vacation. A client calls asking about an invoice. Nobody knows what stage the deal is at — because the entire history lived in one person's head and in a "Comments" column filled in however he felt like it.
Situation three. The manager asks for a report: "How many deals closed this month, what's the average ticket, where's the bottleneck?" A team member spends two hours building a pivot table. The data is already outdated by the time they finish.
None of these are catastrophes. But all three are lost time and money.
CRM is not just another spreadsheet. It's a system that makes the sales process manageable: stores every client's history, reminds you of tasks, shows the pipeline in real time, and doesn't lose data when someone goes on vacation.
The global CRM market exceeded $112 billion in 2025 and is growing at 12.6% annually (Statista, 2025). This isn't a trend — it's an indicator that businesses en masse are no longer coping with growth in spreadsheets.
| Criterion | Excel | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Entry cost | Free / already have it | From $10–30 per user per month |
| Setup time | Minutes | 1–4 weeks |
| Collaboration | Version conflicts | Single real-time database |
| Automation | Macros only | Reminders, emails, tasks — out of the box |
| Analytics | Manual pivot tables | Ready dashboards, funnel, forecasts |
| Scale | Comfortable up to ~300–500 rows | No limits |
| Data loss risk | High | Low: full history logged |
| Best for... | 1–2 people, <100 clients | Team of 3+, active pipeline, analytics needed |
I try not to sell tools to clients just because they're trendy. So I always look at data.
According to Salesforce, companies after implementing CRM report:
Average ROI — $8.71 for every $1 invested (Nucleus Research). Payback period — 12–13 months on average.
But there's an important caveat I always mention: CRM doesn't sell for you.
According to Gartner, 43% of companies cite low team adoption as the main problem after implementation. If managers don't enter data — the system is empty. We always include not just setup in our projects, but team training and workflow guidelines. Without that — it's money down the drain.
Case one — our client, a building materials distributor, 8 managers. When we came to the first meeting, I saw a Google Sheet with 4,000 rows. The manager couldn't answer "how many deals are currently in progress" without a half-hour call with the team.
We implemented amoCRM in 6 weeks. Results after 2 months:
The bottleneck wasn't the sales team. 70% of deals were getting stuck at the invoicing stage — accounting couldn't keep up. Without CRM, this would have been impossible to see.
Case two — a B2B company in Uzbekistan, consulting, long deals over 3 months. The problem: nobody understood at which stage clients were "freezing," there were no automatic reminders. After implementing amoCRM with trigger automation — the deal cycle shortened by an average of 20 days (crmpro.uz, 2025). For B2B with a long cycle, that's significant.
I usually tell clients: if three or more points apply — it's time.
If none of these apply — Excel is still enough for you. No irony.
91% of companies with teams of 11+ already use CRM (Capterra, 2026). Yet 22% of businesses still manage clients in spreadsheets — and most of them not because it's better, but because they never had time to explore the alternative.
In Uzbekistan's market, this window of opportunity is especially visible. Competition in sales automation isn't dense yet — those who build the system now gain an advantage not for a month, but for years.
The time to switch isn't when you've already broken down. It's when you want to grow faster than your current tool allows.
<Get in Touch>
Let us help you achieve top rankings and sustainable growth
